Session: Biodiversity Scenario
This is a session of the GEOSS Architecture Workshop
The Scenario provided below was discussed in this session. (If there were any presentations send them to George Percivall)
Results of the session are in this document.
Biodiversity scenario - Draft
1. Summary
Protected Areas (PAs) and Protected Area Systems are designed to protected natural and cultural resources, to maintain biodiversity (ecosystems, species and genes) and ecosystem services. This scenario will support protected area system designers, and protected area managers to understand the representativeness of the system or PA, and to quantify its status, trends and threats.
Identify the specific decisions to be made.
1. Determine if the PA boundary is valid (correctly delineated) and update the boundary as necessary.
2. Determine if the national, regional, continental and global protected areas system is adequate for capturing the representatives of ecosystems, species and genes, especially for endemic, keystone and threatened and endangered species. This is, in effect, a protected areas gap analysis.
3. Determine the effectiveness of protected area systems and individual protected areas.
4. Determine the System and PA effectiveness related to climate and land use change.
Provide references for additional information.
IP3 Biodiversity and Climate Change Demonstration project
European Commission Joint Research Centre project: Evaluating Protected Areas in Africa.
2. Context and pre-conditions
Identify the actors in the scenario. Actors are any persons involved in the scenario.
- Protected Area managers
- National park agencies
- International protected area institutions (UNESCO, UNEP-WCMC, The Nature Conservancy, IABIN, Ramsar)
Specific information assumed to be available before the scenario begins.
- Time series climate data
- Time series phenology data
- Multidate land cover data
- Transportation data
- Protected areas data (WDPA and other)
- Population data
- Species data (IUCN Red List, GBIF)
The scenario would couple the IP3 species modeling activity with the JRC Africa Protected Areas analysis, allowing users to conduct JRC-like analyses for their region, nation or specific protected area. The scenario thus builds upon previous investment, promotes continuity of analysis, provides modeling capability and expands geographic scope and usership. Components are:
1) A species modeling package whereby one could assimilate geospatial data, overlay with species presence/ absence and or abundance data, and choose from a set of models to predict distribution.
2) Take the JRC Protected Areas web site http://www-tem.jrc.it/PA/intro.html, and develop a tool to perform the same analysis for any of the 110,000 protected areas.
3) A generic Exploratory Data Analysis Tool
Functionality:
1. Assemble and / or link to geospatial data
2. A stock set of analytical and reporting units: country, watershed, ecosystem protected area boundaries
3. Flexible analytical and reporting units
3. Scenario Events
The scenario is elaborated in the table: as a set of steps that result in the creation of decision support products developed in collaboration by the actors.
| Step Description |
| 0 Reduce uncertainty in species distribution using niche modeling |
| 1. Determine the effectiveness of a protected areas system and individual PAs in protecting species |
| 2. Conduct PA assessment using indicators (status, vulnerabilities, threats) developed by JRC |
| 3. Evaluate effectivess of system and PA(s) in climate and land use change scenarios. |
| 4. Conduct a gap analyses and make decisions to revise the system and or individual PAs |
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| Biodiversity Discussion Outcomes Overview.doc | 22 KB |
A position paper on Proposed
A position paper on Proposed Activities for 2008 GEO ADC Interoperability Process Pilot Project (IP3) address a topic for Biodiversity. This position paper was provided by Siri Jodha Singh Khalsa, Point of Contact for the IP3.


Derek Gliddon of UNEP
Derek Gliddon of UNEP comments on the draft scenario:
I've sat with our Protected Area's people and reviewed the User Scenario.I'm a bit confused about the document that has been created. It contains a lot of good material, but is it outlining a single use-case scenario or multiple? It appears to me to be multiple scenario documented as one. Some of the "specific decisions" in section 1 are big topics in their own right and should (I feel) be expanded as separate scenario. "Table 1 - Decision Scenario" doesn't seem to be a use-case scenario, rather it appears to give a list of different scenario.Am I on the wrong track?Regards,Derek